http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/13/orbital-junk-live-bout-time/ Andrew Ford's maxi-tech music Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:29:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/13/orbital-junk-live-bout-time/comment-page-1/#comment-4570 vincent scott Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:33:57 +0000 http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/13/orbital-junk-live-bout-time/#comment-4570 it definitely bumps. and it's definitely a live-style performance, not a record quality track, because the styles aren't necessarily consistent. it's my kinda style of minimal tech house, that's what i'd call it. for me it starts out good, but doesn't really get going until that 4:27 mark, where the shit gets squelchy and more of a twisted robotic sound. i think that acid sound should be present before, only to be a reference as to what the hell happened when that "robotic" stuff comes in. with that bumping robotic stuff, you could really get into that electro-house stuff that's getting really big these days. in reality, i think a basic rule should be to have a track that has a certain kind of unique personality that would allow remixes of that track. but of course if you're not releasing the track, then none of that matters. it definitely bumps. and it’s definitely a live-style performance, not a record quality track, because the styles aren’t necessarily consistent. it’s my kinda style of minimal tech house, that’s what i’d call it. for me it starts out good, but doesn’t really get going until that 4:27 mark, where the shit gets squelchy and more of a twisted robotic sound. i think that acid sound should be present before, only to be a reference as to what the hell happened when that “robotic” stuff comes in. with that bumping robotic stuff, you could really get into that electro-house stuff that’s getting really big these days. in reality, i think a basic rule should be to have a track that has a certain kind of unique personality that would allow remixes of that track. but of course if you’re not releasing the track, then none of that matters.

]]>