<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flower XGH3000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/14/flower-xgh3000-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/14/flower-xgh3000-2/</link>
	<description>Andrew Ford's maxi-tech music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent scott</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/14/flower-xgh3000-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewford.org/wordpress/2007/10/14/flower-xgh3000-2/#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>perhaps have that other synth sound (coming in at 1:40 i think) a little more left than all the way to the right.  i would like it a little more present on the left (and hopefully my speakers aren&#039;t switched around!).  maybe take that sound and put it into a slight reverb/echo just to get it&#039;s subtle qualities on that other channel.  that initial sound is coming out of both channels.  which doesn&#039;t mean the other one should, of course, but i think it could benefit by doing the thing i suggested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps have that other synth sound (coming in at 1:40 i think) a little more left than all the way to the right.  i would like it a little more present on the left (and hopefully my speakers aren&#8217;t switched around!).  maybe take that sound and put it into a slight reverb/echo just to get it&#8217;s subtle qualities on that other channel.  that initial sound is coming out of both channels.  which doesn&#8217;t mean the other one should, of course, but i think it could benefit by doing the thing i suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.526 seconds -->

